(Aqar) in the Crisis Lab
By Yusuf Sirraj
The statements of Sovereign Council member Malik Aqar, calling for an end to the war through peaceful negotiation, came as a significant step at a delicate time. Despite the reservations raised about Aqars remarks from the platform of the government, as he announced, the initiative seems worthy of analysis. Its importance is further highlighted by the mixed reactions it has generated, particularly the intense backlash from members of the former regime. The Islamic Movement did not confine itself to sharp criticisms of the Sovereign Council members statements, through the pens and platforms of its members; it also supported its criticism with a statement expressing its anger towards the man and condemning his call for former members of the dissolved National Congress Party to engage in self-critique and review their thirty-year experience.
Without a doubt, the step to end the war will be welcomed by all Sudanese except those who ignited it on the morning of April 15. Whether Aqar speaks on behalf of the Sudanese government or the army, he should present his initiative to the regional and international mediators who are pursuing the same goal.
The content of Aqars initiative, which involves forming a caretaker government to manage state affairs, seems disconnected from reality and does not introduce anything new in resolving major issues, especially after the escalated war. These issues require addressing their root causes and ushering in a transitional phase that leads to genuine democratic transformation, ending wars, and military coups.
The immediate cessation of the war is undoubtedly the only step toward sitting at the negotiating table for solutions. As Aqar demanded, dealing firmly with the leaders of the former regime who escaped from prison is an opportunity for him to prove his support for the glorious December revolution that elevated him to his current sovereign position. He must act and implement immediately.
The sincerity of the initiative by the Sovereign Council member and its attribution to the current government can be tested in its crystallization as an official negotiating stance based on real principles and a strong will that boldly expresses opinions without succumbing to the agendas of war advocates and instigators. A full readiness for holding accountable those who bear the brunt of reckless war actions is essential. Only when words translate into actions can confidence be built that the will to return to the path is emerging.
